Political Rhetoric, Armed Violence and Threats to Democracy: An Analysis of Stochastic Terrorism Within the Media Ecosystem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61166/ld.v1i4.36Keywords:
Stochastic Terrorism, Political Rhetoric, Dehumanization, Media EcosystemAbstract
This research is motivated by the rise of political violence fueled by the convergence of inflammatory political rhetoric and firearm accessibility. In the digital era, political communication has shifted from policy persuasion to an instrument of dehumanization that threatens the stability of deliberative democracy. This study aims to analyze how socio-psychological mechanisms and media ecosystems contribute to the phenomenon of contemporary political violence. The research method employed is a qualitative approach with library research. Secondary data were gathered from reputable scientific literature, policy reports, and relevant textbooks. Qualitative content analysis was conducted by integrating cognitive-neoassociation theory, totalism theory, and deliberative democracy theory to map the causality between mass communication patterns and the probability of violence. The results indicate that extreme political rhetoric creates a "siege mentality" that dehumanizes political opponents as existential threats. This phenomenon is validated as stochastic terrorism, where social media algorithms act as incubators for radicalization that trigger lone-wolf violent actions. The availability of firearms further exacerbates the situation by providing physical capability to ideologically radicalized individuals. In conclusion, the threat to democracy today is systemic, originating from the erosion of communication norms at the elite level to the manipulation of information in the digital sphere. Effective mitigation requires the construction of political "cooling structures," media algorithm regulation, and the restoration of discursive ethics to return human dignity to the political arena.
References
Berger, J. M. (2018). Extremism. MIT Press.
Berkowitz, L. (2012). A different view of anger: The cognitive-neoassociation conception of the relation of anger to aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 38(4), 322–333.
Bliuc, A. M., Betts, J., Vergani, M., Iqbal, M., & Dunn, K. (2018). Online networks of racial ideology: A subdivision of the ideology of white supremacy. Language, Identity & Education, 17(2), 1–15.
Chermak, S., & Gruenewald, J. (2015). Laying a foundation for the study of terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 27(3), 407–417.
Fadhlurrohman, M. (2023). Ancaman populisme terhadap institusi demokrasi: Studi kasus kekerasan politik. Jurnal Demokrasi dan Tata Kelola, 5(1).
Grossman, D., & Christensen, L. W. (2004). On combat: The psychology and physiology of deadly conflict in war and in peace. Warrior Science Publications.
Gunn, J., & Lucaites, J. L. (2010). The rhetoric of political violence. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 13(1), 1–7.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Polity Press.
Hamm, M. S., & Spaaij, R. (2017). The age of lone wolf terrorism. Columbia University Press.
Haryanto, S. (2021). Retorika politik dan polarisasi masyarakat di era media sosial. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (JSP), 25(1).
Hassan, S. (2015). Combating cult mind control. Park Street Press.
Koehler, D. (2019). Violence and terrorism from the far-right: Policy options to counter an elusive threat. ICCT Policy Brief.
Lifton, R. J. (1989). Thought reform and the psychology of totalism. University of North Carolina Press.
Maarif, S. (2018). Etika komunikasi politik di era post-truth. Jurnal Etika Politik, 2(1).
Marwick, A. E., & Lewis, B. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online. Data & Society Research Institute.
Mietzner, M. (2020). Populism, democratic decline and the role of the middle class in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 50(3), 418–440.
Munn, L. (2020). Alt-right pipeline: Individual journey to extremism online. First Monday, 25(6).
Nurhasanah, S. (2019). Radikalisme online dan ancaman terhadap ruang publik demokratis. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 8(2).
Pratama, B. A. (2022). Dehumanisasi dalam kontestasi politik: Analisis wacana kritis di media sosial. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi (JIK), 19(1).
Rakhmani, I. (2019). Mainstreaming extremism: The role of media and political discourse. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 50(2).
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings. Dalam L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 10, hlm. 173–220). Academic Press.
Squire, M. (2020). Antisocial computing: Explaining public extremism and private radicalization. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.
Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
Susilo, D. (2020). Ekosistem media dan penyebaran hoaks: Tantangan bagi demokrasi deliberatif. Jurnal Mimbar: Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan, 36(1).
Wahyuni, H. I. (2018). Kekerasan simbolik dalam retorika politik kontemporer. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Gadjah Mada, 15(2).
Wojcieszak, M. (2009). ‘Carry on carried away’: Is optimization of cognitive outcomes a dream or a reality? Journal of Communication, 59(1), 86–103.
Zulkarnain, I. (2021). Terorisme 'lone wolf' dan radikalisasi individu di Indonesia: Perspektif psikologi sosial. Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, 7(1).
Hudallah, 2017, Perlawanan Kyai Indramayu terhadap Penjajah Jepang Tahun 1944
